[General] Help

Chris Bero bigbero at gmail.com
Fri Aug 1 12:24:11 CDT 2014


My view of expensive probably doesn't line up with anyone else's. It does
look pretty expensive, and I doubt we'd be able to even reliably detect
70-200 milli Newtons.

But that is awesome. I'd be for it if you want to make one, let me know
what I can help with.

Chris Bero


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, WebDawg <webdawg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't know.  Do you think it would be expensive to build though?
>
> It looks simple enough to build.  It looks cheap.
>
> Bet it can be improved and it would be cool to experiment with.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Chris Bero <bigbero at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That doesn't seem to be a lot of thrust, do you think there'd be a
>> practical application for it here on earth?
>> On Aug 1, 2014 11:32 AM, "WebDawg" <webdawg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive
>>>
>>> http://emdrive.com/demonstratorengine.html
>>>
>>> http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2014-3853
>>>
>>> Anyone want to build one of these?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> General mailing list
>>> General at lists.makerslocal.org
>>> http://lists.makerslocal.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> General at lists.makerslocal.org
>> http://lists.makerslocal.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at lists.makerslocal.org
> http://lists.makerslocal.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.makerslocal.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20140801/ca3a77f0/attachment.html>


More information about the General mailing list