[ML-Hams] 2015.03.10 HAM Meeting notes

[Bruce Campbell]

I was also thinking about the Non-ham mesh option. I see this in This would
be good in a disaster situation. We can use Ham for the long to get out of
an effective area. We can then set up a mesh covering the effected area
that any WiFi device can connect to. That would be extremely useful.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Bruce Campbell <phillybruce at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Kris Kirby <kris at catonic.us> wrote:
>
>> I would recommend starting a dialog with the building owner for a roof
>> penetration, with an eye toward replacing it on move-out with a roof
>> vent and/or fan.
>>
>
> I would not use the words "roof penetration" within 100 miles of the
> building owner. A roof penetration is problematic because of leaks and
> there is no need for it. If we mention this, it could shut down the owners
> willingness to let us do other things.
>
> I'm not worried about getting through he walls. There are lots of options
> already available.
>
> Bruce (KG4HLZ)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.makerslocal.org/pipermail/hams/attachments/20150312/0e09eb4b/attachment.html>